{"id":7259,"date":"2019-09-06T03:34:18","date_gmt":"2019-09-06T08:34:18","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.flonewman.com\/?p=7259"},"modified":"2019-09-06T03:48:20","modified_gmt":"2019-09-06T08:48:20","slug":"brainstorm-your-counterarguments-to-or-analyses-of-2","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.flonewman.com\/2019\/09\/06\/brainstorm-your-counterarguments-to-or-analyses-of-2\/","title":{"rendered":"Brainstorm Your Counterarguments to, or Analyses of, one other views"},"content":{"rendered":"
Brainstorm Your Counterarguments to, or Analyses of, one other views<\/title> <\/p>\n
There’s no one way that is right answer the views the ACT provides you with. Several of this will depend on which perspective you are taking. As an example, then disagree with them in the next paragraph as I present my support for Perspective One if i agreed with Perspective One, which takes a negative view of the effects of intelligent machines, I might want to discuss both of the other two perspectives (which both take positive views of intelligent machines) in one paragraph, and.<\/p>\n
Since i am arguing for<\/strong> attitude Three (devices challenge our some ideas by what people are or could be, which pushes us and devices toward brand brand new opportunities), i will argue against<\/strong> attitude One and attitude Two individually, because i’ve strong evidence for my analyses of every viewpoint.<\/p>\n
As the essay just calls for you to definitely evaluate the connection in the middle of your viewpoint and one or more<\/em> other viewpoint, I could also decide not to discuss that perspective at all if I had lots of evidence to use in my comparison of my perspective and Perspective One, but nothing to say about Perspective Two. In this situation, I happened to be in a position to think about solid arguments pros and cons both of one other perspectives, them and their relationship to my perspective below so I chose to analyze both of. Once more, they are definitely not worded within their last kind.<\/p>\n
Perspective One:<\/strong> everything we lose aided by the replacement of men and women by machines is some element of our very own mankind. Also our mundane daily encounters not require from us courtesy that is basic respect, and threshold for other individuals.<\/p>\n
Proof<\/em>: a number of our phone conversations are carried out maybe perhaps perhaps not with individuals, however with advanced technologies. that do not always work on 100per cent<\/p>\n
Explanation<\/em>: People have therefore frustrated using the technology that whenever they push “0” to talk to a human that is real tend to be rude and discourteous<\/p>\n